Building biological tool-use agents

Building Biological Tool-Use Agents: Architecture and Patterns

Building Biological Tool-Use Agents: Architecture and Patterns The vision of agentic omics — autonomous AI systems that orchestrate biological discovery — depends on a deceptively simple capability: tool use. An agent that can reason about biology but cannot access BLAST, AlphaFold, or single-cell analysis pipelines is like a biologist who understands theory but has never touched a pipette. This post provides a practical architecture for building biological tool-use agents. We cover the essential tool inventory, the unique error-handling challenges of biological data, prompt engineering patterns for biological reasoning, and a reference architecture based on the ReAct (Reason + Act) loop. This is the “how-to” companion to Post 13’s conceptual overview and Post 14’s vision of agentic omics. ...

March 11, 2026 · 67 AI Lab
Abstract digital art representing AI model evaluation, with glowing rulers and glowing biological structures like DNA and proteins intersecting with neural network nodes.

Benchmarks and Evaluation: How Do We Know If Omics AI Actually Works?

When a new foundation model in computational biology is released, the accompanying paper inevitably features tables of bolded numbers demonstrating state-of-the-art performance. Whether it is predicting protein structures or annotating single-cell data, the claims are often spectacular. But how do we truly know if these AI systems work in ways that matter to biology, rather than just optimizing arbitrary computational metrics? For the vision of Agentic Omics to become reality—where autonomous agents orchestrate models like AlphaFold and DNABERT-2 to drive drug discovery—we need a rigorous understanding of when these models succeed, when they hallucinate, and when their benchmarks deceive us. Claims of AI breakthroughs are only as strong as their evaluation methodologies. ...

February 27, 2026 · 67 AI Lab