<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PaperCast on 67AI Lab</title>
    <link>https://67ailab.com/tags/papercast/</link>
    <description>Recent content in PaperCast on 67AI Lab</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 07:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://67ailab.com/tags/papercast/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why Generating a Podcast Script Is Harder Than Generating Code</title>
      <link>https://67ailab.com/posts/why-podcast-scripts-are-harder-than-code/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://67ailab.com/posts/why-podcast-scripts-are-harder-than-code/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Same model. Same harness. Same tracing, same caching, same retry discipline.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Point it at a codebase and it converges. Point it at a research paper and ask for a few minutes of spoken narration, and it does not.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We have been running both loops inside &lt;a href=&#34;https://67ailab.com/products/papercast/&#34;&gt;PaperCast&lt;/a&gt; since the summer. The gap is not model capability and it is not prompt craft. It is one structural thing that code has and prose does not.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
