<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Software Engineering on 67 AI Lab</title>
    <link>https://67ailab.com/tags/software-engineering/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Software Engineering on 67 AI Lab</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.7</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 22:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://67ailab.com/tags/software-engineering/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Code Review Has to Change for AI-Generated Code</title>
      <link>https://67ailab.com/posts/code-review-ai-generated-code/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 22:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://67ailab.com/posts/code-review-ai-generated-code/</guid>
      <description>AI coding makes code abundant, but review capacity stays scarce. Here is a practical model for shifting from line-by-line review to risk-based change verification.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
